Texas and Florida Have Become National Models for Using the Police State To Wage Culture War Battles

From C.J. Ciaramella at Reason Magazine:

This phenomenon started in the states, and none have pursued it with more intensity than Florida and Texas, where governors and legislatures have competed to show that they're fighting the hardest against what they call "woke" excess and leftist hegemony. Now this style of governance—using criminal law, mass surveillance, tip lines, and the threat of police violence to wage the culture war—is going national. This doesn't just implicate the freedom of trans people or high schoolers who want to read Toni Morrison; it's a danger to every American who wants to live, work, and travel without being monitored and menaced by the state.

You probably don’t need me to tell you how scary this stuff is if you play it out. For most of my adult life, conservative-leaning folks have told me how important “freedom” is, and slowly but surely we’ve seen what they actually mean by that. Freedom for them to live how they want, and for the rest of us to fall in line.

We’re watching the slow legislation of morality, where lawmakers use “values” as a cover for control. None of it is about protecting anyone – it’s about enforcing a single worldview. What’s worse is that most of these laws don’t even need to hold up in court to do damage. The vagueness is the point. People self-censor, schools and libraries overreact, and the chilling effect spreads quietly and efficiently.

This is not what freedom looks like. And it’s not an accident. We’ve allowed a warped definition of freedom to take hold, one that means “my comfort matters more than your rights.” Whether by design or by ignorance, it’s become the rallying cry of people who have been convinced that equality is an attack on their way of life.

I can’t help but think about how much of this has been fueled by media that profits off fear and outrage.Looking back over the past 25 years, it’s clear that FOX News & social media algorithms will be blamed for whatever state we end up in. They’ve trained people to see enemies around every corner. It’s poisoning our politics and our relationships, and it’s only getting worse because division keeps the clicks coming.

We have to start pushing back. Not in abstract ways or clever tweets, but through the simple blocking and tackling of democracy. Call your representatives – seriously, it’s easy and only takes a few minutes. Vote in local elections. Speak up when you see injustice or when government steps into places it doesn’t belong. Staying quiet because it feels hopeless is exactly what they’re counting on.

If we don’t draw the line now, we may wake up one day in a country that still calls itself free but no longer remembers what that word ever meant.

VW ID.4, 6 Months Later

Back in February I wrote about my growing frustration with Tesla ownership. The Model 3 gave me super fun acceleration but also things like squeaks, cheap materials, a cramped trunk, and the constant feeling that I was driving a rolling advertisement for Elon Musk. Every time I saw the news, I thought about selling what some were already calling a “swasticar.” Eventually, I did. I traded it in for a Volkswagen ID.4, hoping for a more practical car that still happened to be electric.

Six months later, I can say the change has been worth it. The ID.4 feels better made in almost every way. The doors close with a satisfying thud, the seats are comfortable, and the cabin materials feel solid. It is not luxury, but it does not need to be. Most importantly, it is roomy. I can pack up camping gear for Cub and Boy Scout trips with my kids without the frustrating trunk shuffle I had to do with the Tesla. Day-to-day errands are easier too, and that counts for a lot.

The range estimates have also been a pleasant surprise. Tesla’s trip computer always started too high and then walked itself back to reality, which made it hard to trust. The VW learns your driving style and gives you a number that feels accurate from the start. That little bit of honesty makes the car easier to live with.

I also appreciate that the VW feels like a car first and an EV second. Tesla always leaned into its identity as a tech product on wheels, for better and worse. The ID.4 has a driver display with speed, range, and navigation right where you expect it, and a second screen that handles CarPlay and maps. I do not miss the giant tablet-only approach.

That said, the VW is not perfect. The inside door handles sometimes need two pulls to actually open, which gets old quickly – this is something that happened due to a recall handle replacement, and I’m considering going back to the dealer to get worked out. CarPlay can take a minute or two to connect if the car has been sitting for a while, which is a long silence at the start of a drive. And the software that controls scheduled charging almost never works the way it should. I like to charge during off-peak hours, especially in the summer, but the car often ignores the schedule. If I forget to reset it when I get home, I end up paying much higher rates. It feels like I am fighting the software instead of trusting it.

Then there are the smaller annoyances: the car shuts off the moment you stand up from the driver’s seat unless you press a button to keep things running, the range tops out around 240 miles compared to the 350 I used to get, regen braking has to be toggled on every time, and the cameras are lower quality with no side-view support for lane changes. None of these ruin the car, but they remind you this is still an early-generation EV.

Even with the quirks, I am glad I switched. The ID.4 is comfortable, practical, and much less stressful to drive than my Tesla ever was. More importantly, I no longer feel like my car says something about me that I do not want it to say. My plan is to hang onto this one for a few years, then see what the next wave of EVs looks like. I still have my eye on what Rivian and Honda are up to. But for now, sanity restored.

Wind Downs and Ramp Ups

Left to my own devices, my short term memory is a sieve. Without routine, structure, and a trusted system, I’d probably end up in a ditch somewhere wondering why my calendar looked empty while my Slack was on fire.

What saves me isn’t a clever productivity hack or the latest app. It’s the rituals I repeat every day at the edges of work. How I start and how I finish. Those bookends keep me sane.

Why Edges Matter

Cal Newport once wrote about his “work shutdown ritual,” where he ends each day by deliberately closing the loop on everything and saying out loud: schedule shutdown, complete. The phrase doesn’t matter so much as what it represents. It’s a moment of finality, a way to tell your brain the day is over.

That resonated with me. If I don’t start the day intentionally, the day runs me. If I don’t end it cleanly, I keep gnawing on unfinished tasks long after I’ve shut my laptop. My routines are the boundaries that give me the space for deep work in the middle. So, I’ve created a way to help me stay on track with my busy workweeks as an engineering manager.

My Ramp Up

Most mornings begin the same way. Coffee, a deep breath, and about half an hour of getting my bearings. Things is the first stop. Everything I need to remember lives there, from big projects to tiny half-formed reminders. If something enters my head, it goes in the system. No exceptions. After reading Getting Things Done a few decades ago, the idea of a trusted system has always resonated with me, and Things hits the sweet spot of beauty, power and availability for me.

I spend those morning minutes reviewing what’s in front of me, shuffling things around, and deciding on the one to three tasks that matter most that day. That’s the trick. Not ten, not a sprawling list of hopes and dreams. Just the handful of things that will make the day feel like progress if I get them done. I’ll carve out space on my calendar to actually do them, which keeps me from just living in meetings and email. Honestly, there are some days where I’m bursting at the seams with upcoming meetings that I might only have 1 to-do item on the list. The key is about being realistic with yourself so the list remains important.

By the time I’m finished, I know what matters and I can trust that everything else has been captured for later. That trust is what clears my head enough to focus.

My Wind Down

The other side of the day looks similar in spirit, if not in details. I give myself the last thirty minutes to put everything in order. I’ll glance at my remaining tasks and either finish them, move them, or add enough notes so I know where to pick up tomorrow. I’ll close the browser tabs that have multiplied during the day, scan through email and Slack, and leave things in a state where nothing feels half-open. If I close a browser tab that has something key in it, I’ll capture it as a to-do item for the next morning.

I’ve skipped this routine before, and I always pay for it. Instead of resting, I’ll be at dinner remembering some stray Slack message I didn’t respond to, or lying in bed trying to reconstruct what I forgot to capture. My personal belief is simple: when I’m working, I give everything I’ve got. When I’m done, I want to actually enjoy my time off. This system is what makes that possible.

The Payoff

The middle of the day is always messy. That’s just the nature of work, especially knowledge work where you’re responsible for tons of projects and people. But these routines give me bookends I can rely on. A calm, deliberate start and a clean, decisive stop. They keep stress low, protect my focus, and let me walk away confident that I’ve done what matters.

New tariff rules bring ‘maximum chaos’ as surprise charges hit consumers

From NBC News:

Some U.S. shoppers say they are being hit with surprise charges from international shipping carriers as the exemption on import duties for items under $800 expires as a part of President Donald Trump’s tariff push.

Hear me out … it’s almost like this administration is incompetent and doesn’t have our best interests in mind. In a world where one wanted to roll out tariffs to achieve their goals but also manage in a way that doesn’t choke out economic activity, they would likely do so in a staggered way that allowed businesses and consumers to plan both purchasing decisions as well as investment strategy around factory relocations, etc.

I personally have been hit by a number of these types of fees recently and I have zero clue what the real cost will be until a few days before delivery. The things I’m working with are minor consumer purchases. I can only imagine if I were trying to run a business.

Google concedes the open web is in “rapid decline”

From In court filing, Google concedes the open web is in “rapid decline”:

If the increasingly AI-heavy open web isn't worth advertisers' attention, is it really right to claim the web is thriving as Google so often does? Google's filing may simply be admitting to what we all know: the open web is supported by advertising, and ads increasingly can't pay the bills. And is that a thriving web? Not unless you count AI slop.

No matter how Google spins this in a very narrow sense, it’s very concerning to see how quickly AI generated content is drowning out content on the web. Feels like Facebook and other companies integrating AI into their posting tools are only hastening the demise of their platforms.

America Tips Into Fascism

From Garrett Graff at Doomsday Scenario:

I think many Americans wrongly believe there would be one clear unambiguous moment where we go from “democracy” to “authoritarianism.” Instead, this is exactly how it happens — a blurring here, a norm destroyed there, a presidential diktat unchallenged. Then you wake up one morning and our country is different.

It’s easy to imagine fascism as some big, dramatic moment: a coup, a speech, a breaking point. What Garrett Graff argues in this piece is more unsettling. We don’t wake up one morning to a dictatorship. We slide into it bit by bit. Norms get bent, then broken. Power gets consolidated. Institutions get bullied into silence. And by the time you look around, the country doesn’t quite work the way you thought it did.

What makes this feel different now is how normal the abnormal has become. Governors sending troops into opposition-run cities, armored vehicles rolling down D.C. streets, federal agencies harassing critics. It is all happening in plain sight. And many are celebrating the cruelty! Graff’s warning isn’t that fascism is coming someday, it is that it is already here in pieces. And that should alarm everyone, regardless of where they fall on the political spectrum. The scary part is how easy it is to stop noticing when each step just feels like the new baseline.

Avoiding Algorithms

It’s wild how in the last 15 years we have given over almost all of our entertainment and information diet over to corporations who use algorithms to ensure we spend more and more of our attention in their sandbox. More often than not, these changes are a net negative. That sounds dramatic, but think about it: how often do you open an app “just to check one thing” and find yourself half an hour later feeling worse than when you started? Hell, how many times do we open said app after a push notification invited us to do so? We get sucked into these systems in ways we don’t intend.

The outcomes aren’t subtle either. People get radicalized, feel depressed, follow rage bait, fight pointless culture wars, and consume an endless feed of vibes-based, samey music and video slop designed to keep us clicking, watching and listening.

This shows up in a ton of places, especially where we are entertained and informed:

  • Music (endless playlists and “for you” mixes that all sound alike)
  • News (anger drives clicks, so anger dominates)
  • Social media (engagement above all else)
  • Streaming video & YouTube (just one more recommended clip!)
  • Reddit and forums (dopamine hits from karma and hot takes)

None of these categories are inherently bad. Music streaming is an incredible bargain. YouTube can teach you almost anything. Social networks can connect you with real community. But the defaults are tuned for addiction, not for your well-being.

So how do we stay intentional about what we consume without becoming hermits? A few things I’ve been focusing on lately:

  • Take back your music. Apps like Albums or Longplay are great for focusing on the music you chose, not whatever the algorithm feeds you. Advanced mode? Buy your music outright and play it on something offline. I’ve legitimately considered tracking down a last-gen iPod Classic — though I do love my Bluetooth headphones too much to go full retro. (Apple bringing back an iPod in the age of streaming is probably a pipe dream, but I’d be first in line.)
  • Use RSS. It’s still the best way to follow sites, YouTube channels, subreddits, and even individual social accounts without surrendering to a feed. Tools like Reeder or Tapestry can help bring it all together.
  • Rely on people, for reccomendations. Want a good movie to watch? Services like Letterboxd let you see what your friends enjoyed instead of what Netflix thinks will keep you awake longest.
  • Avoid algorithm-first social media. Bluesky, Mastodon, Pixelfed — all of these prioritize community and human choice over recommendation engines. Or, if none of it serves you, quit entirely.

For me, the general guiding principle is that I need to pause and ask whether the thing in front of you is content you actually sought out, or “content” being pushed at you by a company whose only metric is time spent in-app.

One last angle that’s not algorithmic but still worth calling out: audiobooks over podcasts. For me, podcasts increasingly feel like junk food – especially in politics-  where so much is just topical rage bait. Audiobooks, on the other hand, feel like vegetables: a slower, more nourishing way to spend time listening.

We’re never going to escape algorithms completely. But if we can recognize where they’re shaping our attention and make small choices to push back, we stand a better chance of keeping them from running our lives.

Discord vs Social Media

After writing about where I spend time online, I’ve been thinking more about why most social media doesn’t click for me anymore. The short version: it feels too performative. Posting starts to feel like homework, and keeping up feels like work.

What I’ve realized is that I’ve been using Discord more and more — especially for sports talk — and it scratches the itch in a way the big networks don’t.

I’m of two minds about it. On the one hand, the experience is so much better when there’s an admin who keeps things on track. On the other hand, that also means conversations happen in private rooms instead of on the open web. I want Mastodon (and maybe Bluesky) to succeed because I believe the open web needs to survive. Discord is closed, and that’s a drawback.

The app itself is kind of a mess too. So many updates. But the communities I’m in are filled with generally funny, kind people, and it feels more like actually hanging out than yelling into the void. It’s real-time, so you don’t feel pressure to read every post or “catch up.” You just drop in, chat for a bit, then move on with your day.

So yeah — even with all its faults, I’m using Discord more than any of the so-called “social” apps. It feels casual. It feels low-stakes. And most importantly, it feels fun.

2025 Social Media Check In

Last year, I wrote about where I was spending time online and how I was feeling about it. Most days, I’m just not that interested in what strangers have to say about sports, tech, or whatever else is trending. Still, I haven’t quit completely. Here’s where things stand today:

Bluesky is probably my favorite platform at the moment. The vibes are okay, especially during football and soccer seasons. I find myself checking in a few times a week, more often during Liverpool, Atlanta United or Buccaneers games. That said, my use is artificially limited right now because I’m mostly stuck with the PWA on desktop. I’m really looking forward to Phoenix, a new Bluesky client from the team behind Ivory. Once that drops, I imagine I’ll be on the platform more regularly.

Mastodon is still solid. The community there is thoughtful and kind, but I just don’t think to check it very often. It’s just a bit too homogenous for me. I have, however, continued to subscribe to Ivory even though I barely use it. That’s mostly out of respect for the developers. At some point I’ll probably cancel, but I haven’t quite talked myself into it yet.

Every once in a while, I’ll fire up Threads but it feels less like a social media app and more of an algorithmic firehose of content that Meta thinks I might like.

Instagram is a familiar trap. I go through cycles of installing it, getting sucked in, then deleting it again. It’s too addictive and not particularly rewarding (other than the dog videos).

Facebook continues to be the worst. I deleted my account years ago, but had to create a new one recently because my son’s Boy Scout troop uses it for communication. I’ve done my best to keep the new profile barren — no friends, no interests, no algorithm — and I’d love to delete it again as soon as I can.

In terms of actual usage, I’ve got a 30-minute screen time limit set on my phone and I honestly can’t remember the last time I hit it. Most of my social browsing happens on my computer in between other tasks, which helps keep things in check.

Both Bluesky and Mastodon still feel relatively healthy. The sentiment is mostly positive and the stakes are low, which is nice. But I still catch myself wondering: what’s the actual value here?

Jack of All Trades

tablet near a notebook

We’re pushing 15 years of the iPad being in our lives, and I still can’t figure out exactly where it fits.

That’s not for lack of trying. I’ve owned more iPads than I care to admit (I think I’m up to 7 overall), ranging from the original to the mini, a few Airs, the Pro, and back to the Air again. I’ve thrown keyboards at it, paired controllers to it, installed every “Pro” app I could justify, and traveled with it as my only computer. And yet, no matter how many times I try to force the iPad into my workflow, I always end up coming to the same conclusion: I’m a Mac guy first, an iPhone guy second, and the iPad just doesn’t make sense in my life.

And that’s frustrating, because the hardware is incredible. iPads are sleek, featherlight, and ridiculously powerful. They’re silent, cool to the touch (although it seems like recent versions can’t claim that as readily), and have some of the best screens I’ve ever used. Paired with the Magic Keyboard and an Apple Pencil, they feel like they should be the perfect modern computer. But that promise has always been just out of reach. It’s always close enough to tempt, never close enough to deliver.

The Identity Crisis

At its core, the iPad still feels like a product in search of a purpose. It tries to be both a tablet and a laptop, but never fully commits to either. Apple’s marketing leans hard into productivity with their “Your next computer is not a computer” ads, but the limitations of iPadOS make that claim feel aspirational at best.

There’s no real desktop environment. No overlapping windows. No persistent file system. Even with Stage Manager and other recent improvements, multitasking remains clunky. The experience feels like a series of clever workarounds rather than a thoughtful system for doing actual work. And as someone who spends their day working on a Mac, the mental overhead of “working differently” on an iPad isn’t freeing … it’s tiring.

Redundant by Design

The biggest problem with the iPad isn’t what it can’t do – it’s that everything it does well is already covered by other devices and nearly everything it does software wise is just compromised enough to make me kind of hate using it.

I did the math recently: a base 11” iPad Pro with a Magic Keyboard costs around $1300. For about $1500, I could get a base M2 MacBook Air ($1099), a Nintendo Switch ($299), and a Kindle Paperwhite ($110). That’s three devices that are each better at the thing they’re built for. The Mac handles real work. The Switch is pure portable gaming. The Kindle is the best reading experience out there, full stop.

Meanwhile, the iPad is supposed to do all of that – and it kind of does! but never quite as well.

It’s too heavy and bright to be a great e-reader. It’s not quite powerful or flexible enough to be a real gaming device. And as a laptop replacement? It’s still not there. For nearly every task I’d consider doing on an iPad, another device beats it on ergonomics, capability, or joy of use.

What I Actually Use It For

A quick look at my Screen Time confirms it: I use my iPad for reading on Instapaper, browsing the web, and watching YouTube. That’s it. And that’s been consistent across every iPad I’ve owned over the years.

It’s a nice gadget to have around, no question. But when you step back and think about cost versus utility, it’s really hard to justify. My iPad Air is “best in class” for what it is, but that doesn’t mean it’s necessary. If it disappeared tomorrow, I wouldn’t miss it.

Platform Priorities

That’s led me to a broader realization: of all the platforms Apple makes, the Mac is the only one I couldn’t live without. iOS is essential because of the iPhone, sure – but if push came to shove, I could get by without iPadOS, watchOS, or even tvOS. The Mac, though, is where I work, write, and think. It’s the foundation of how I use computers. I’m sure part of this is just the old man in me talking (which is apparently becoming a common theme around here).

Ironically, the success of iOS may be the thing holding the iPad back. Apple became a juggernaut by turning the iPhone into a cultural and economic force — but it also became addicted to growth. Services revenue, ecosystem lock-in, and tight control over how software works across platforms now feel like constraints rather than strengths.

Apple seems terrified of making iPadOS too powerful, lest it cannibalize MacBook sales. As a result, the iPad is stuck in a strange limbo: it’s too expensive and overpowered to be “just a tablet,” but not quite capable enough to be a real computer.

The Workflow Problem

Working on an iPad always feels like compromise. The Magic Keyboard is excellent, the cursor support is surprisingly good, and the app ecosystem has matured, but the device never quite gets out of your way. Whether it’s the awkward vertical screen when typing, the limitations around windowing, or the hoops you have to jump through to do basic file management, the iPad demands that you adjust your workflow to fit it, rather than adapting to how you already work.

That’s not inherently bad – but for long-time Mac users, it introduces a lot of friction. And friction kills momentum. The upcoming changes to things like background tasks, windowing and such in iPadOS 26 are great, but after using the public beta for a little while, it’s just a worse implementation of something that’s already really solid – MacOS.

Software Ceiling

Even the best apps on iPad like Photoshop, Logic, Affinity and Notion all feel like lite versions of themselves. That’s partly due to the App Store’s sandboxing model and partly because of Apple’s tight control over what iPadOS is allowed to be. Background tasks are limited. External monitor support is half-baked. Automation is still an afterthought unless you’re a Shortcuts wizard.

And while Stage Manager is a step in the right direction, it’s not enough to make multitasking feel natural. It still feels like you’re being asked to pretend this is a laptop, when it clearly isn’t.

The Long Goodbye

So here I am again: with a beautiful, capable iPad that I barely use. Selling it feels wasteful. Tt’s still a joy to hold and use in short bursts, but I’d be lying if I said it played a meaningful role in my digital life. More than anything, it just clutters things up. It adds another device to charge, update, secure, and think about. And for what? A slightly nicer YouTube experience on the couch?

There’s a good chance I’ll keep it “just in case,” like I always do. But if I’m being honest, it’s time to admit that the iPad is never going to become what I hoped it would be. It’s a gadget I want to love … but not one I actually need.