Camino Docs Team Mailing List!

Wednesday, October 6th, 2004

Great news for anyone who was want­ing to help out with the doc­u­men­ta­tion for Camino - Josh Aas and Mike Pinker­ton pulled some strings with the higher ups with Mozilla, and got a mail­ing list hosted on their server! So, if you’re inter­ested in join­ing, and help­ing out even a little, join at:

http://​mail.​mozilla.​org/​l​i​s​t​i​n​f​o​/​c​a​m​i​n​o​-docs

This is going to make life a whole lot easier for all of us.

Wel­come! If you're new here, you may want to sub­scribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Posted on October 6th, 2004 | 10 Comments »

iPod Users Are Thieves?

Monday, October 4th, 2004

According to Steve Ballmer (CEO of Microsoft), “The most common format of music on an iPod is ’stolen’.” Speak­ing to a group of press on the sub­ject of DRM and secu­rity in the Win­dows OS, Ballmer decided to take a stab at Apple’s iPod, and the fact that it sup­ports DRM-​less mp3’s, amongst other formats.

The CEO is basi­cally trying to use scare tac­tics to con­vince mem­bers of the enter­tain­ment indus­try to sup­port Microsoft’s Stan­dard, rather than Apple’s. That is fine - that’s busi­ness. What annoys me is actu­ally twofold:

1) Ballmer makes a totally unfounded, fact-​less state­ment. By making a blan­ket state­ment that all iPods are vehi­cles for pirated music, he shows how truly igno­rant he is about the sub­ject. I can only offer anec­do­tal evi­dence here, as there is no hard data on what per­cent­age of music on an iPod is actu­ally legally owned. How­ever, I can speak for myself and others that I know. Most people who own iPods LOVE music - people don’t pay 300, 400 dol­lars simply to have all of their music with them at all times. With that in mind, these are people who love the musi­cians who supply them with the music they are hear­ing. iPod owners are typ­i­cally people who are more than will­ing and more than happy to either go to their local store and get the album of the artist they enjoy, or down­load them on iTunes, eMusic, etc.

I per­son­ally am that type of person. I budget X dol­lars a month towards music pur­chases, evenly split between iTunes and phys­i­cal CDs (I’m not going to get into the RIAA v. Record­ing artist argu­ment today). Of the 5000+ mp3s/AAC Files I own, less than 50 are not legally mine. These are songs that I have had for years - from friend’s CD’s etc… and these are the first to be replaced when I buy new/used CDs each month - so that number shrinks by 10 or so every month, not grows.

2) Sec­ondly, the fact that Ballmer isn’t trying to work on an OPEN DRM codec irks me. This is just another scare tactic by Microsoft to corner the market on rights man­age­ment, and they are taking shots at the cur­rent leader (Apple) to scare the indus­try, rather than trying to create a supe­rior prod­uct (has anyone seen the first ver­sion of the MS music store? awful…). Cus­tomers don’t want DRM, they don’t want to be told how they can and cannot use what they own. The more restric­tive com­pa­nies try to be, the less the prod­uct will sell. AAC is at least fair, and fairly flex­i­ble. Is it per­fect? Hardly. But it’s a great bal­ance of pro­tec­tion for the artists/labels, and flex­i­bil­ity for the consumer.

Ballmer’s state­ments are only going to back­fire on Microsoft, in my opin­ion. Trying to scare the indus­try into using their stan­dard is what got us into this whole mess to begin with. Music piracy has been around longer than the iPod, and it’s not going away any time soon. To try to claim all iPod users are pirates is laugh­able, and shows how little Microsoft “gets it” sometimes.

Posted on October 4th, 2004 | No Comments »

It’s Official!

Saturday, October 2nd, 2004

Today has been a good day.

After fin­ish­ing up Zeldman’s Book, I was inspired to bring my code up to the Tran­si­tional XHTML 1.0 stan­dard. The main reason was I simply wanted the site to work across plat­forms - the site looks the same in IE6, IE4, Mozilla, Camino, Safari, or Fire­fox. What I didn’t know is that the speed of my site would increase so much. Sep­a­rat­ing the struc­ture from the layout makes things a lot more light­weight, and in turn, a lot less taxing on web browsers.

The easy part was work­ing through all my old code, making sure every T was crossed and every low­er­case j dotted. The hard part is still only par­tially done - if I really want to make the entire site totally com­plaint, I will have to go through all of my old posts, and make sure all of the hyper­links are formed cor­rectly, there are alt tags on all of my images, etc. Hon­estly, this is not as much of a pri­or­ity to me right now, but it is some­thing I will even­tu­ally get around to. Con­sid­er­ing I have made over 400 posts - that’s a lot of code.

I’ve also come to the con­clu­sion that Mov­able­Type is an awful way to manage a weblog. I haven’t had to main­tain some­thing this much since I was using win­dows 98. Every month or so, I catch myself repair­ing per­mis­sions, having the DB lose info, get­ting random errors, and in turn, losing con­tent. It’s really a pain, and I’m start­ing to think I may switch over to another sim­i­lar system, such as Word­press. We’ll see what happens.

In any event, I dare you to make your site standards-​compliant.

Posted on October 2nd, 2004 | 9 Comments »