Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008
I’ve tried to be good lately and not post about politics as much on here (I’ve been posting most political-type stuff on my tumblelog), but this one was too much to pass up.
The New York Times has posted an editorial today about the ongoing Democratic race for the nomination, and if you didn’t know any better, you’d think that they were ‘un-endorsing’ her (the NY Times endorsed Hillary right before Super Tuesday). While the author (rightly) does not claim that Obama’s hands are completely clean in the latest round of mudslinging, he certainly makes it clear that Hillary is the one that seems right at home in this style of politics, and is benefiting from attempting to destroy Obama’s electability by focusing on fringe issues that do not matter to Democratic voters.
Because Hillary has been constantly attacking, there has been little time to talk about things that I feel voters deserve after 7+ years of divisive, brain dead politics. As the author says, we deserve a nuanced debate for a change, about how each candidate will approach all of the issues facing our nation over the next 4+ years. Instead, we get multiple questions about a flag lapel pin. We get Hillary invoking 9/11, Giullani-style, unprovoked. Even Karl Rove would be proud of her fear-mongering.
I guess you could say that I ‘called it‘ back in February after Super Tuesday came and went. I wasn’t alone in this prediction back then, and I’m certainly not alone now. However, I would like someone to ask her to honestly answer the question of how she plans on winning the nomination. So far, all I have heard is that she plans to say that Obama is not electable, and she is. However, her negatives are off the charts among independents and Republicans. Most Democrats will vote for her, but if the Superdelegates were to flip the pledged delegate count in favor of her, I think a lot of folks would walk away from this election. Now that’s what I call an electability problem.
I’m still confident that Obama will win the nomination, as there is just not a realistic path for Hillary. But god, am I tired of all of this. I think the positive is that Hillary is bringing up all of the petty stuff that 527’s and McCain’s folks will try to bring up in the fall. If it’s already had it’s run on the news now, it’s kind of hard to revisit it in a substantial way come general election time.
Regardless, it’s time for Hillary to hang it up if she can’t win North Carolina and Indiana in two weeks. She’ll try to spin it (just like she claims she ‘won’ Texas, she won by double digits in Pennsylvania, and she’s winning the popular vote) in a number of ways if she doesn’t win one of those primaries, but the stark truth is that she needs to win every primary by a 70 - 30 margin to overtake Obama’s delegate lead. That’s just not going to happen.
Sadly, she doesn’t realize this. Ah well.
Technorati Tags:
politics, obama, clinton, hillary, barack, north carolina, indiana, pennsylanvia, democrat
Posted on April 23rd, 2008 | No Comments »